| 翻訳と辞書 |
| R v Lovelass and Others ： ウィキペディア英語版 |
R v Lovelass
''R v Lovelass and Others'' (1834) 172 ER 1380 is a formative case in the history of UK labour law. It saw the Tolpuddle Martyrs, who were farm workers that wished to form a union to prevent wage cuts, be convicted and deported to Australia. It triggered protests which led to the workers' eventual release. It stands as a symbol of the repression of freedom of association in the United Kingdom, which largely remained in place until the Trade Union Act 1871 and the Trade Disputes Act 1906.
==Facts==
In Tolpuddle, a village in Dorset, George Lovelass (also spelled "Loveless" in a different report of the trial,〔R v Loveless and Five Others (1834) 1 Moody and Robinson 349, 174 E.R. 119〕 and sometimes "Lovelace") and James Lovelass, James Brine, James Hammett, and John Standfield, had met in Thomas Standfield’s house, and had taken an oath to combine and raise wages in their profession as agricultural workers. They formed the ''Friendly Society of Agricultural Labourers''. A witness, Edward Legg had also taken the oath, and further to reveal nothing. Under the Unlawful Oaths Act 1797, passed in response to the threat of mutinies following the French Revolution, it was made illegal to make an oath, and a further offence to not reveal the oath.
Lock (also spelled as Lark in the case report) gave evidence as a witness. Edward Legg as a witness said the following.
Counsel for the defence argued that the purpose of the 1797 Act was to target mutiny and sedition, to break allegiance to the King. Associations to raise wages should no longer be illegal. The lodges of Freemasons were no different. Therefore, the Tolpuddle labourers had done nothing unlawful.
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
■ウィキペディアで「R v Lovelass」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
| 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|